Reports

Barash v. Siler, 124 Fed.Appx. 689; 2005 WL 551653 (2nd Cir. 2005).  

 In an action in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the firm defended Paul and Eric Siler in an action brought against them by an assignee of an unpaid promissory note. The firm prevailed at the trial court on the grounds that the action was barred by the statutes of limitations. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court judgment.

Reports
May 30, 2024

Atkins v. Topp Comm, Inc., 874 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

 In another shareholder derivative action, the defendant company requested the appointment of a special investigator to ascertain whether it was in the best interest of the company to...

Reports
May 30, 2024

Boswell v. Boswell, 2005 W.L. 906189, N04D04-2167, (April 20, 2005 Fla. 4th DCA).

 In a complex shareholder’s derivative action, the plaintiff, representing minority shareholders, sued two individual non-resident defendants who were represented by the firm. The firm moved to dismiss the...